Tuesday, September 30, 2014

In Yakima, Wa for Legislative Council on River Governance.

Working with Democrat & Republican delegates from Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Montana on issues of common interest including Columbia River Treaty, Waters of US rule, and Transfer of Federal Land to states, plus hearing an update on the Wanapum Adam fracture repairs.


http://chumly.com/n/28a748f

Friday, September 26, 2014

Update from Sen Fielder - No losers in public land transfer

No losers in public land transfer
"There are no losers to what we are going to propose,” said Kane County Commissioner Doug Heaton, a founding member of American Lands Council (ALC).

"Let me be really clear about this,” he said as he explained why he has taken a leadership role in compelling congress to transfer federal lands to the states."We are not AGAINST anybody. We are FOR managing the resources so we don’t actually burn our forests to the ground, destroy our watersheds, or kill millions of animals in the process. We are FOR not putting more pollution into the environment -- than all our industrial processes combined -- because of mismanagement and the wildfires that are occurring. We are FOR having some family sustaining jobs that come as we manage the natural resources and provide a benefit not only for the animals and the environment, but for people as well. We are FOR being energy independent as a nation, and as states. We are FOR being financially independent as a nation, as a state, as counties, and private citizens.”

The American Lands Council was formed two years ago by Heaton and a number of county commissioners and state legislators in Utah and Nevada to protect public access, provide better environmental health, and restore economic productivity on federal lands. Today, ALC has attracted support from elected officials in every western state as the idea of shifting to state based public land management is increasingly viewed as the only way to ensure public lands are managed with greater care than we see coming from Washington DC these days.

All the western states are feeling the pain of decades of declining federal stewardship. For some, the turning point occurred during the government "shutdown" last October. Remember when Congress didn't want to fund
Obamacare and President Obama responded by deeming all of our nation's public lands "non-essential"? Federal golf courses and health clubs were kept open, but federal agents were dispatched to blockade open air
monuments and evict hunters and hikers from the back country, bringing tourism, recreation, and resource industries to a grinding halt across the country.

I don't think you would ever see a Montana Governor kick all the law abiding hikers and hunters off Montana's public lands. His career would be over. But Washington DC got away with it. When the feds shutdown all the federally controlled public lands in America, they revealed precisely how little they care. It was states and counties that stepped up to re-open the lands. We get it. Public lands matter to us.

During Montana’s legislative study of federal land management, we identified the most serious problems on federal lands today, chief among them are continuous reductions in public access, rapidly declining forest health, extreme wildfire fuel build up, lack of economic productivity, and lack of accountability out of Washing DC.

Although our study was supposed to consider all lawful options to correct the problems, some Democrat committee members would not allow discussion on the subject of transferring federal lands to the state. While our bi-partisan committee received some testimony on the issue, we were never really allowed to give this subject the due diligence it deserves. Naysayers suppressed the conversation by asserting Montanans would foolishly sell all the land if we were put in charge.

However, in closing remarks of our final legislative interim meeting, we had a breakthrough when a Democrat Senator pointed out that safeguards could be put into place to ensure transferred federal lands would remain in public status. He suggested that perhaps Montana could acquire 1% of the federal land in our state each year for 100 years. Eventually we began to see bi-partisan agreement that transferring control of federal lands to the state may be possible if handled correctly.

That breakthrough was preceded by incredibly enlightening testimony from Mr. Martin Goldney, Chief Negotiator for the Northwest Territories (NWT) of Canada who described how and why Canada recently transferred control of federal lands to the smaller, more nimble territorial government.

It took ten years of hard work to negotiate the deal, but this past spring both the Northwest Territories and Canada achieved a win-win arrangement that is responsive to local people and financially beneficial to all
parties.

In this arrangement, the federal government decided to pay the local government of the Northwest Territories to manage the public lands and resources. The Northwest Territories hired all the federal employees who had been working within the region, thus ensuring no loss of jobs and a continuation of related expertise. The Northwest Territories is giving the federal government 50% of the proceeds from natural resource revenues from these lands, and local tribal governments will receive a large share as well.

The big advantage is that land management decisions will be made by people who live in the affected region rather than a distant and somewhat disconnected federal government."When decisions are made by people closer to the subject matter, the decisions tend to be better,” Goldney noted.

I couldn't agree more. Here in America, if we endeavor to work constructively across party lines, we too can bring forth tremendous improvements in public land management to benefit people and the environment. It is time to begin earnest, fact based discussions and credible feasibility analysis on transfer of public lands. Suppression of information and fear mongering has got to stop. If we are thoughtful and agree to work together toward real solutions, there need not be any losers.

For more info, please sign in and leave your comments at
www.jenniferfielder.us and visit www.AmericanLandsCouncil.org

Thank you, and God bless you and the land we love.

Jennifer
Senator Jennifer Fielder
Montana State Senate - District 7
www.jenniferfielder.us
http://chumly.com/n/28909d4

Friday, September 19, 2014

Out for a hike in the national forest yesterday and so discouraged to run into so many trees dying and falling down.

We heard from USFS Service administrators in legislative hearings last week that if all goes well next year, under the new provisions of the Farm Bill, they may be able to treat up to 5,000 acres of the 5 million acres in Montana classified at imminent risk of declining forest health. That's 1/10th of 1%. At that rate it will take the federal government 1,000 years to clean up our forests. I think Montana can do better than that!


http://chumly.com/n/28709e9

TGIF!

Hope you all have a fantastic weekend!
https://chumly.com/n/286eb67

State lawmakers talk strategy on Utah's public lands war with federal government | Deseret News

www.deseretnews.com/article/865609693/State-lawmak...?pg=1

"I don’t think anyone can objectively look at federal land policy and come to the conclusion that it is working," he said. "It is not working on the range, not working on the forest, not working on the extractive industry, not working for the recreationers, not working for the local communities trying to survive. And Washington is not aware of that. Washington is not working on that." - Deputy Attorney General Tony Rampton - D, Utah

"As Utah continues on the path of its goal to gain control of lands from the federal government, a wide array of strategies loom as possibilities. A meeting of the Commission on the Stewardship of Publ"


https://chumly.com/n/286e92c

Friday, September 5, 2014

Guest opinion Facts knock down strawman arguments from land transfer opponents

billingsgazette.com/news/opinion/guest/guest-opini...37582
It is well documented that under federal mismanagement, our environment, economy, and people are needlessly suffering. Perfectly good access routes are being torn out, sustainable selective timber harvest has been reduced to an afterthought, dense overgrowth and extreme fire hazard is destroying Montana's watersheds and wildlife, valuable natural resources are being wasted, and a lot of people’s jobs have vanished. Good management could reverse all that by accommodating a responsible balance of access, health, and productivity.

Most Montanans know better public land management is needed. Senator Tester & Governor Bullock admitted this just last year. Bullock even went on to say how much better our state public land management is than the failed federal model. By attempting to demonize Republicans who are working to achieve better public land management, and summarily refusing to even consider a model of more sensible state-based management, Democrat operatives reveal they have no interest in changing the status quo, nor do they believe in the ability of Montanans to wisely manage our lands and resources.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” Mahatma Gandhi said that, and it’s a pretty reliable barometer of political progress. The"


https://chumly.com/n/283ba66